From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Urena v. Strafford Cnty. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Oct 20, 2014
Civil No. 14-cv-00323-LM (D.N.H. Oct. 20, 2014)

Opinion

Civil No. 14-cv-00323-LM

10-20-2014

Felix Eliezer Urena v. Strafford County Department of Corrections, Superintendent, et al.

cc: Felix Eliezer Urena, pro se


ORDER

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated September 22, 2014. "'[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.'" School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir. 1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

SO ORDERED.

/s/_________

Landya B. McCafferty

United States District Judge
Date: October 20, 2014

cc: Felix Eliezer Urena, pro se


Summaries of

Urena v. Strafford Cnty. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Oct 20, 2014
Civil No. 14-cv-00323-LM (D.N.H. Oct. 20, 2014)
Case details for

Urena v. Strafford Cnty. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:Felix Eliezer Urena v. Strafford County Department of Corrections…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: Oct 20, 2014

Citations

Civil No. 14-cv-00323-LM (D.N.H. Oct. 20, 2014)