From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Urdang v. Mahrer, Krause, Lubert, Berman Bennett

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 9, 1959
163 N.E.2d 163 (Ohio 1959)

Opinion

No. 36206

Decided December 9, 1959.

Supreme Court — Dismissal sua sponte — No debatable constitutional question involved — Negligence — Person undergoing radiology treatment — Degree of care owed — Injured by fall in lavatory — Uneven floor level — Judgment on jury verdict for plaintiff — Motion for judgment notwithstanding verdict overruled — No motion for new trial — Appeal to Court of Appeals — Seeking final judgment — Assignment of errors — Reversal and remand for new trial.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County.

Mr. A.H. Dudnik and Mr. Fred Weisman, for appellee and cross-appellant.

Messrs. Arter, Hadden, Wykoff Van Duzer and Messrs. Johnson, Weston, Blackmore, Cory Hurd, for appellant and cross-appellee.


The appeal as of right herein is dismissed, sua sponte, for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and PECK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Urdang v. Mahrer, Krause, Lubert, Berman Bennett

Supreme Court of Ohio
Dec 9, 1959
163 N.E.2d 163 (Ohio 1959)
Case details for

Urdang v. Mahrer, Krause, Lubert, Berman Bennett

Case Details

Full title:URDANG, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT v. MAHRER, KRAUSE, LUBERT, BERMAN…

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Dec 9, 1959

Citations

163 N.E.2d 163 (Ohio 1959)
163 N.E.2d 163

Citing Cases

Hawthorne v. DaVita, Inc.

While no general rule can be stated, those cases seem to deal with instances of gross inattention to…

Buerger v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. Corr

While no general rule can be stated, those cases seem to deal with instances of gross inattention to…