From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Urban v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada
Jun 9, 2021
No. 82136-COA (Nev. App. Jun. 9, 2021)

Opinion

82136-COA

06-09-2021

HAWK RIVERZ URBAN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

GIBBONS, C.J.

Hawk Riverz Urban appeals from an order of the district court denying a motion to correct illegal sentence. Sixth Judicial District Court, Humboldt County; Michael Montero, Judge.

Urban argues that the district court erred by denying his motion. In his September 15, 2020, motion, Urban claimed that the district court lacked jurisdiction to convict him because Nevada was not properly admitted into the United States and therefore its laws are invalid. Urban also contended that the district court lacked jurisdiction to convict him because the Nevada Revised Statutes were not properly enacted.

A motion to correct an illegal sentence may only challenge the facial legality of the sentence. Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). "An illegal sentence" is "one at variance with the controlling sentencing statute, or illegal in the sense that the court goes beyond its authority by acting without jurisdiction or imposing a sentence in excess of the statutory maximum provided." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). "A motion to correct an illegal sentence presupposes a valid conviction and may not, therefore, be used to challenge alleged errors in proceedings that occur prior to the imposition of sentence." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). Urban's claims fell outside the narrow scope of claims permissible in a motion to correct an illegal sentence because they did not implicate the jurisdiction of the district court, see Nev. Const, art. 6, § 6(1); NRS 171.010; United States v. Cotton, 535 U.S. 625, 630 (2002) ("[T]he term jurisdiction means . . . the courts' statutory or constitutional power to adjudicate the case." (internal quotation marks omitted)), and his 16-to-40-month prison sentence is facially legal, see NRS 200.481 (2)(f). Accordingly, the district court did not err by denying his motion, and we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

Tao, J., Bulla, J.

Hon. Michael Montero, District Judge.


Summaries of

Urban v. State

Court of Appeals of Nevada
Jun 9, 2021
No. 82136-COA (Nev. App. Jun. 9, 2021)
Case details for

Urban v. State

Case Details

Full title:HAWK RIVERZ URBAN, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:Court of Appeals of Nevada

Date published: Jun 9, 2021

Citations

No. 82136-COA (Nev. App. Jun. 9, 2021)