From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Urban D.C. v. 29 Green St., LLC

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 26, 2022
205 A.D.3d 634 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

No. 16015 Index No. 153008/20 Case No. 2021-04445

05-26-2022

Urban D.C. Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 29 Green Street LLC, et al., Defendants, McGowan Builders, Inc., et al., Defendants-Respondents.

Law Offices of Matthew T. Worner, White Plains (Matthew T. Worner of counsel), for appellant. Grae & Grae, LLC, New York (Previn A. Waran of counsel), for respondents.


Law Offices of Matthew T. Worner, White Plains (Matthew T. Worner of counsel), for appellant.

Grae & Grae, LLC, New York (Previn A. Waran of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Kern, J.P., Oing, Singh, Moulton, Scarpulla, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nancy M. Bannon, J.), entered May 11, 2021, which denied plaintiff's motion to vacate an order, same court and Justice, entered February 23, 2021, which, among other things, dismissed the complaint and the response to defendants' counterclaims without prejudice, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court providently exercised its discretion by declining to vacate its prior order, entered on plaintiff's default (CPLR 5015[a][1]; see Rivera v Shypri Realty Corp., 198 A.D.3d 448, 448-449 [1st Dept 2021]). Plaintiff's conclusory references to "law office failure" and unspecified "personal health issues" of its counsel, without detail or evidentiary support, do not rise to the level of a reasonable excuse for the default (see Liparulo v New York City Health and Hosps. Corp., 193 A.D.3d 593, 594 [1st Dept 2021], lv dismissed 37 N.Y.3d 1088 [2021]). Because plaintiff failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse, we need not address whether it had a meritorious claim against defendants or whether it had a defense to the counterclaims (see U.S. Bank N.A. v Brown, 147 A.D.3d 428, 429-430 [1st Dept 2017]).

We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Urban D.C. v. 29 Green St., LLC

Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 26, 2022
205 A.D.3d 634 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Urban D.C. v. 29 Green St., LLC

Case Details

Full title:Urban D.C. Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. 29 Green Street LLC, et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 26, 2022

Citations

205 A.D.3d 634 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 3464
166 N.Y.S.3d 866

Citing Cases

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Prot. Physical Therapy, P.C.

Law office failure may amount to a reasonable excuse (see Heijung Park v Nam Yong Kim, 205 A.D.3d 429, 429…

Marks v. Nail & Spa 72, Inc.

Inaction by an insurance carrier has also been viewed as "akin to law office failure" (see Klein, 95 A.D.2d…