From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Uraz v. Cioffi

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Mar 24, 2022
No. 358917 (Mich. Ct. App. Mar. 24, 2022)

Opinion

358917

03-24-2022

Tunc Uraz v. Dr Todd Cioffi


LC No. 2020-034637-CZ

Stephen L. Borrello, Michael F. Gadola Judges

ORDER

Brock A. Swartzle, Presiding Judge

On the Court's own motion, in lieu of dismissing the claim of appeal because it was not timely filed within 21 days after entry of the August 19, 2021 order appealed from, MCR 7.204(A)(1)(a), the claim of appeal is treated as a delayed application for leave to appeal.

Appellant shall file a brief in support of the delayed application for leave to appeal substantially conforming to the requirements of MCR 7.212(C), and proof of service of that brief on appellees' counsel, within 56 days after the date of this order. Appellees may timely file an answer to the delayed application within 21 days after service of appellant's supporting brief. See MCR 7.205(C). If appellees file such an answer appellant may file a reply brief within 21 days after service of the answer. MCR 7.205(D); MCR 7.212(G). Thereafter, the delayed application will be submitted to the Court for a decision. MCR 7.205(E).

Failure by appellant to timely file the supporting brief required by this order may result in placement of the case on the involuntary dismissal docket without further notice to the parties. See MCR 7.217. 1


Summaries of

Uraz v. Cioffi

Court of Appeals of Michigan
Mar 24, 2022
No. 358917 (Mich. Ct. App. Mar. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Uraz v. Cioffi

Case Details

Full title:Tunc Uraz v. Dr Todd Cioffi

Court:Court of Appeals of Michigan

Date published: Mar 24, 2022

Citations

No. 358917 (Mich. Ct. App. Mar. 24, 2022)