From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Untalan v. Stanley

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 5, 2022
2:19-cv-07599 ODW (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-07599 ODW (JEMx)

01-05-2022

ANGELICA R. UNTALAN, Plaintiff, v. WARREN A. STANLEY, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 54(B)

THE HONORABLE OTIS D. WRIGHT, II

For the reasons given in the Court's separately-filed Order Withdrawing Order on Motions for Partial Summary Judgment [113]; Granting in Part Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [97]; Granting Defendants' Motion For Partial Summary Judgment [94]; Denying Defendants' Motion for Order to Certify Interlocutory Appeal [116]; and Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Certify Appeal as Frivolous [117] (Dkt. No. 127), the Court granted the motion for partial summary judgment in favor of Defendants Warren A. Stanley, Joseph Farrow, Tariq D. Johnson, Joseph Zagorski, Jonathan Cochran, and Justin Vaughan. 1

The Court determines that there is no just reason for delay and therefore directs entry of final judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), in favor of Defendants Warren A. Stanley, Joseph Farrow, Tariq D. Johnson, Joseph Zagorski, Jonathan Cochran, and Justin Vaughan and against Plaintiff Angelica R. Untalan. 2


Summaries of

Untalan v. Stanley

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 5, 2022
2:19-cv-07599 ODW (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2022)
Case details for

Untalan v. Stanley

Case Details

Full title:ANGELICA R. UNTALAN, Plaintiff, v. WARREN A. STANLEY, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 5, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-07599 ODW (JEMx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 5, 2022)