From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Universal Dyeing Printing v. US Textile Printing

United States District Court, C.D. California
Oct 19, 2011
Case No. CV 09-09132 DDP (VBKx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV 09-09132 DDP (VBKx).

October 19, 2011


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' EX PARTE APPLICATION TO SHORTEN TIME AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SANCTION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [Docket No. 184]


Presently before the court is Defendants' Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time for Hearing Defendants' Motion for Sanction of Dismissal with Prejudice Pursuant to FRCP 16(f) and Local Rule 83-7. The court grants Defendants' Ex Parte Application to Shorten Time and decides Defendants' Motion without argument.

According to the parties, neither side has fully complied with the court's pretrial orders or local rules. At issue in this motion, Plaintiff evidently filed certain pretrial documents one day late. While the court expects parties to comply fully with its orders and all local rules, Plaintiff's late filing does not rise to the level of warranting dismissal. The court therefore DENIES Defendants' Motion for Sanction of Dismissal with Prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Universal Dyeing Printing v. US Textile Printing

United States District Court, C.D. California
Oct 19, 2011
Case No. CV 09-09132 DDP (VBKx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)
Case details for

Universal Dyeing Printing v. US Textile Printing

Case Details

Full title:UNIVERSAL DYEING PRINTING, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff, v…

Court:United States District Court, C.D. California

Date published: Oct 19, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV 09-09132 DDP (VBKx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 19, 2011)