From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Universal Casualty Co. v. Godinez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Oct 29, 2015
2:11-CV-00934-MCE-GGH (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2015)

Opinion

          Alex Darcy, Askounis & Darcy, PC, Chicago, Illinois, Attorneys for Plaintiff Universal Casualty Company.

          Aaron P. Morris, Morris & Stone, LLP, Tustin, California, Attorney for Defendants Yogesh Kumar, Links Insurance Services, Inc., National Transportation Associates, Inc. d/b/a NTA General Insurance Agency, Inc.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL

          FREDERIC BLOCK, District Judge.

         Now Comes, Plaintiff Universal Casualty Company ("Plaintiff" or "UCC") and Defendants Yogesh Kumar ("Kumar"), Links Insurance Services, Inc. ("Links"), National Transportation Associates, Inc. d/b/a NTA General Insurance Agency, Inc. ("NTA") (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, and pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and Release between the parties, hereby submit the following stipulations:

         It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the Parties, through their respective attorneys, that the above-entitled action, having been fully compromised and settled pursuant to the Settlement Agreement and Release, may be dismissed without prejudice and without costs to any party, with the Court to expressly reserve jurisdiction over this matter for purposes of enforcement of and resolving any disputes that may arise in the future regarding the Settlement Agreement and Release, pursuant to Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins., Co., (1994) 511 U.S. 375 [114 S.Ct. 1673 , 128 L.Ed.2d 391].

          ORDER

         THIS MATTER coming to be heard on the above Stipulation and Order for Dismissal, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

         1. Effective, November 10, 2015, this Cause is dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

         2. Pursuant to Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins., Co., (1994) 511 U.S. 375 [114 S.Ct. 1673 , 128 L.Ed.2d 391], Arata v. Nu Skin Int'l, Inc., 96 F.3d 1265 (9th Cir. 1996), the Court expressly reserves jurisdiction over the parties and this matter for purposes of enforcement of and resolving any disputes that may arise in the future regarding the Settlement Agreement and Release, including but not limited, to the entry of any judgment.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Universal Casualty Co. v. Godinez

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division
Oct 29, 2015
2:11-CV-00934-MCE-GGH (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Universal Casualty Co. v. Godinez

Case Details

Full title:UNIVERSAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. FRED C. GODINEZ, III, YOGESH…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California, Sacramento Division

Date published: Oct 29, 2015

Citations

2:11-CV-00934-MCE-GGH (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2015)