Opinion
Case No: 06-13429.
September 15, 2006
ORDER
The Court received Defendant McCaskill's Reply to Order, Renewal of Motions with Clarification and Incorporated Brief (Doc. #13).
The Court considers this a Motion for Reconsideration. Defendants' motion presents the same issues already ruled on by the Court. Further, Defendant failed to demonstrate a palpable defect by which the Court and the parties have been misled. L.R. 7(g)(3).
For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion is DENIED.