From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Zarzar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 30, 2020
18-CR-177 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2020)

Opinion

18-CR-177 (JMF)

11-30-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. SHMUEL ZARZAR, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

:

On August 4, 2020, the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order, familiarity with which is presumed, denying Defendant Shmuel Zarzar's motion for compassionate release pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) based on the COVID-19 pandemic. See ECF No. 53. Zarzar now renews his motion (or, in the alternative, brings a new motion), citing "an explosion of positive Covid-19 cases" at FCI Fort Dix, where he is detained. ECF No. 54, at 1.

Upon review of the parties' submissions, Zarzar's new motion is DENIED. The outbreak at Fort Dix is certainly deeply troubling, but it provides no cause to reconsider the Court's earlier ruling (which was based on many reasons aside from the absence of COVID-19 in the facility at the time), substantially for the reasons stated in the Government's opposition. See ECF No. 59. For one thing, Zarzar himself tested positive for the virus and has apparently recovered, likely leaving him in less danger from the disease than he was in at the time of the Court's earlier decision. See United States v. Matera, No. 02-CR-743 (JMF), ECF No. 452, at 1-2 (S.D.N.Y. June 3, 2020). And while Zarzar cites two medical procedures that were delayed due to the outbreak, he has apparently received one since filing his motion, and the other does not appear to be urgent. See Opp'n 4. In any event, to the extent that Zarzar takes issue with the quality or timeliness of the medical care he is receiving, he has an alternative remedy that is more appropriate than shortening his well-deserved sentence: a civil suit in the district of confinement under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See Matera Order 2.

At the Court's direction, see ECF No. 55, Zarzar filed a supplemental submission regarding his medical condition and attaching medical records. Because they contain personal medical information, the Clerk of Court will file and maintain the letter and attachments under seal. --------

In short, considering the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), the Court once again "concludes that compassionate release is unwarranted." ECF No. 53, at 2. Accordingly, Zarzar's motion is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 54.

SO ORDERED. Dated: November 30, 2020

New York, New York

/s/_________

JESSE M. FURMAN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Zarzar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Nov 30, 2020
18-CR-177 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Zarzar

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. SHMUEL ZARZAR, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Nov 30, 2020

Citations

18-CR-177 (JMF) (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 30, 2020)