From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Young

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Apr 18, 2022
4:18-CR-00484-BSM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 18, 2022)

Opinion

4:18-CR-00484-BSM

04-18-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF v. DEANDRA YOUNG, DEFENDANT


ORDER

Deandra Young's pro se motion to reduce her sentence [Doc. No. 52] is denied because she has not identified a statute or rule that would allow modification of her presentence investigation report. See United States v. Lashley, No. 4:99-CR-185 CAS, 2016 WL 6432788, at *1 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 31, 2016) (“postsentence challenges to a [PSR] which are submitted to the district court must be based on statutes or rules which give the district court jurisdiction to consider the challenge”) (quoting United States v. Warner, 23 F.3d 287, 290 (10th Cir. 1994)).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Young

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Apr 18, 2022
4:18-CR-00484-BSM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 18, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Young

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF v. DEANDRA YOUNG, DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Apr 18, 2022

Citations

4:18-CR-00484-BSM (E.D. Ark. Apr. 18, 2022)