From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Dec 7, 2011
Civil No. 11-910 RB/CG (D.N.M. Dec. 7, 2011)

Opinion

Civil No. 11-910 RB/CG

12-07-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WESTLEY WILBERFORCE WRIGHT (SAMMY MONTGOMERY LOVE), Defendant.


ORDER EXTENDING TIME IN WHICH TO FILE REPLY

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time in Which to File a Reply to Respondent's Amended United States' Response to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 15). The Court having reviewed Defendant's motion, and having been advised that Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Pleters, does not oppose this motion; that this is the Petitioner's first request for an extension; the Court thus being fully advised in the premises finds that Petitioner's motion is well-taken and should be granted.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Motions until February 27, 2012 be granted.

______________

THE HONORABLE CARMEN E. GARZA

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

SUBMITTED BY:

Dennis J. Candelaria

Assistant Federal Public Defender


Summaries of

United States v. Wright

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
Dec 7, 2011
Civil No. 11-910 RB/CG (D.N.M. Dec. 7, 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WESTLEY WILBERFORCE WRIGHT (SAMMY…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

Date published: Dec 7, 2011

Citations

Civil No. 11-910 RB/CG (D.N.M. Dec. 7, 2011)