From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Windyboy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Sep 26, 2017
CR 17-21-BLG-SPW-TJC (D. Mont. Sep. 26, 2017)

Opinion

CR 17-21-BLG-SPW-TJC

09-26-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BIGWIND WINDYBOY, Defendant.


FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Defendant, by consent, appeared before me under Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 and entered a plea of guilty to the Indictment (Doc. 1), which charges the crime of use of interstate facility in aid of racketeering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1952(A)(3).

After examining the Defendant under oath, the Court determined:

1. That the Defendant is fully competent and capable of entering an informed and voluntary plea to the criminal offense charged against him;

2. That the Defendant is aware of the nature of the charge against him and the consequences of pleading guilty to the charge;

3. That the Defendant fully understands his pertinent constitutional rights and the extent to which he is waiving those rights by pleading guilty to the criminal offense charged against him; and

4. That his plea of guilty to the criminal offense charged against him is knowingly and voluntarily entered, and is supported by independent factual grounds sufficient to prove each of the essential elements of the offense charged.

Defendant entered the guilty plea without a written plea agreement, and counsel represented that no more favorable plea agreement offers were made.

Therefore, I recommend that the Defendant be adjudged guilty of the charge in the Indictment and that sentence be imposed.

Objections to these Findings and Recommendation are waived unless filed and served within fourteen (14) days after the filing of the Findings and Recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); Fed. R. Crim. P 59(b)(2).

DATED this 26th day of September, 2017.

/s/_________

TIMOTHY J. CAVAN

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Windyboy

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION
Sep 26, 2017
CR 17-21-BLG-SPW-TJC (D. Mont. Sep. 26, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Windyboy

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BIGWIND WINDYBOY, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 26, 2017

Citations

CR 17-21-BLG-SPW-TJC (D. Mont. Sep. 26, 2017)