From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Oct 15, 2012
Cr. No. 3:09-825 (CMC) (D.S.C. Oct. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Cr. No. 3:09-825 (CMC)

10-15-2012

United States of America, v. Loreze Williams, Defendant.


OPINION and ORDER

This matter is before the court on Defendant's motion for appointment of counsel "to assist me in my Simmons claim." Mot. at 1 (ECF No. 1166, filed Oct. 9, 2012).

Defendant has no "Simmons claim" pending before this court. Moreover, Defendant has no pending matter before this court which qualifies him for the appointment of counsel.

Defendant filed a motion to compel the Government to file a Rule 35 motion. ECF No. 1165 (filed Oct. 9, 2012). There is no constitutional or statutory right to counsel to assist Defendant in this matter.

Defendant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_________________

CAMERON McGOWAN CURRIE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Columbia, South Carolina
October 15, 2012


Summaries of

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION
Oct 15, 2012
Cr. No. 3:09-825 (CMC) (D.S.C. Oct. 15, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, v. Loreze Williams, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION

Date published: Oct 15, 2012

Citations

Cr. No. 3:09-825 (CMC) (D.S.C. Oct. 15, 2012)