From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. White

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Mar 25, 2014
CASE NO. 1:13-CR-89 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 25, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:13-CR-89

03-25-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FRANK WHITE


MATTICE/CARTER


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), I conducted a plea hearing in this case on March 25, 2014. At the hearing, defendant entered a plea of guilty to the lesser included offense in Count One of the Second Superseding Indictment, conspiracy to distribute 28 grams or more of a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of cocaine base ("crack"), a Schedule II controlled substance, in violation of 21 USC §§ 846, 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B), in exchange for the undertakings made by the government in the written plea agreement. On the basis of the record made at the hearing, I find that the defendant is fully capable and competent to enter an informed plea; that the plea is made knowingly and with full understanding of each of the rights waived by defendant; that it is made voluntarily and free from any force, threats, or promises, apart from the promises in the plea agreement; that the defendant understands the nature of the charge and penalties provided by law; and that the plea has a sufficient basis in fact.

I therefore recommend that defendant's plea of guilty to the lesser included offense in Count One of the Second Superseding Indictment be accepted, that the Court adjudicate defendant guilty of the charges set forth in the lesser included offense in Count One of the Second Superseding Indictment, and that the written plea agreement be accepted at the time of sentencing. I further recommend that defendant remain in custody until sentencing in this matter. Acceptance of the plea, adjudication of guilt, acceptance of the plea agreement, and imposition of sentence are specifically reserved for the district judge.

The defendant's sentencing date is scheduled for Monday, July 7, 2014, at 9:00 am.

__________

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

NOTICE TO PARTIES

You have the right to de novo review of the foregoing findings by the district judge. Any application for review must be in writing, must specify the portions of the findings or proceedings objected to, and must be filed and served no later than fourteen days after the plea hearing. Failure to file objections within fourteen days constitutes a waiver of any further right to challenge the plea of guilty in this matter. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b).


Summaries of

United States v. White

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
Mar 25, 2014
CASE NO. 1:13-CR-89 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 25, 2014)
Case details for

United States v. White

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FRANK WHITE

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Date published: Mar 25, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. 1:13-CR-89 (E.D. Tenn. Mar. 25, 2014)