From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Western Surety Co.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 1, 2015
2:15-cv-01168 DAD (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2015)

Opinion

          Garret D. Murai, WENDEL, ROSEN, BLACK & DEAN LLP, Oakland, California, Attorneys for Plaintiff and Real Party in Interest LOZANO CONSTRUCTION.

          FINCH, THORNTON & BAIRD, LLP, Christopher R. Sillari, Attorneys for Defendants, WESTERN SURETY COMPANY and CREW MW II, LP.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE

          DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

         Plaintiff LOZANO CONSTRUCTION and Defendants WESTERN SURETY COMPANY and CREW MW II, LP, by and through their counsel of record, stipulate as follows:

         1. The parties are in the process of settling this matter and have circulated a settlement agreement.

         2. To permit time for the terms of the settlement to be complied with, the parties request that Court continue the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for Friday, October 16, 2015 and associated dates until a date convenient to the Court but no earlier than November 16, 2015.

          ORDER

         Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for Friday, October 16, 2015 is continued to Friday, November 20, 2015. Both parties shall file and serve status reports on or before November 16, 2015.


Summaries of

United States v. Western Surety Co.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 1, 2015
2:15-cv-01168 DAD (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Western Surety Co.

Case Details

Full title:THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, for the use and benefit of Lozano…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 1, 2015

Citations

2:15-cv-01168 DAD (E.D. Cal. Oct. 1, 2015)