From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Webber

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 8, 2013
2:12-CR-0095-WBS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2013)

Opinion

          JAN DAVID KAROWSKY, Attorney at Law, A Professional Corporation, California State Bar Number 53854 Sacramento, CA, Attorney for Defendant.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

          WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between plaintiff, United States of America, and defendant Kevin Webber, through their respective attorneys, that the status conference scheduled for October 7, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. may be continued to November 18, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.

         Counsel for defendant Webber is in the continuing process of having Mr. Webber's mental health evaluated. I have obtained a psychological evaluation of Mr. Webber, who has been diagnosed as suffering from the developmental disorder of autism, which has never been diagnosed or treated previously. This psychological report has been provided to the prosecuting AUSA. Mr. Webber has now been evaluated at the Valley Mountain Regional Center in Stockton, to determine if he could benefit from programs they offer to people suffering from autism and he has been accepted by the Regional Center as a "client" and is waiting for "services" to begin. I believed the Regional Center would have already commenced the assistance to Mr. Webber, but it is taking much longer than had been expected. Both counsel for the government and for the defendant believe it would be extremely helpful in attempting to resolve the charges against Kevin Webber, to wait to determine what programs he would be eligible for at the Regional Center, prior to attempting to craft a disposition which counsel for Mr. Webber has been proposed as Pre-Trial Diversion.

         In order to prepare effectively for a resolution of the charges against defendant Webber, the parties agree that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded through November 18, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

          ORDER

         GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, based on the Stipulation of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status conference is continued to November 18, 2013 at 9:30 a.m. For the reasons recited above, the Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial and therefore excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act through November 18, 2013.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Webber

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Oct 8, 2013
2:12-CR-0095-WBS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Webber

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Kevin Webber, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 8, 2013

Citations

2:12-CR-0095-WBS (E.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2013)