From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Watt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION
Jun 26, 2018
No. 18-CR-43-LRR (N.D. Iowa Jun. 26, 2018)

Opinion

No. 18-CR-43-LRR

06-26-2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EDDY WATT, Defendant.


ORDER REGARDING MAGISTRATE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING DEFENDANT'S GUILTY PLEA

I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

On May 9, 2018, a two-count Indictment was filed against Defendant Eddy Watt. On June 25, 2018, Defendant appeared before United States Chief Magistrate Judge C.J. Williams and entered pleas of guilty to Counts 1 and 2 of the Indictment. On June 26, 2018, Judge Williams filed a Report and Recommendation in which he recommended that the court accept Defendant's guilty pleas. On June 26, 2018, the parties filed a waiver of objections to the Report and Recommendation. The court, therefore, undertakes the necessary review of Judge Williams's recommendation to accept Defendant's plea in this case.

II. ANALYSIS

Pursuant to statute, this court's standard of review for a magistrate judge's report and recommendation is as follows:

A judge of the court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. A judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Similarly, Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 59(b) provides for review of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation on dispositive motions, where objections are made, as follows:
The district judge must consider de novo any objection to the magistrate judge's recommendation. The district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommendation, receive further evidence, or resubmit the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(b)(3).

In this case, the parties waived objections to the Report and Recommendation, and it appears to the court upon review of Judge Williams's findings and conclusions that there is no ground to reject or modify them. Therefore, the court ACCEPTS Judge Williams's Report and Recommendation of June 26, 2018, and ACCEPTS Defendant's pleas of guilty to Counts 1 and 2 of the Indictment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 26th day of June, 2018.

/s/_________

LINDA R. READE, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA

United States v. Cortez-Hernandez, 673 F. App'x 587, 590-91 (8th Cir. 2016) (per curiam), suggests that a defendant may have the right to de novo review of a magistrate judge's recommendation to accept a plea of guilty even if no objection is filed. But see 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b). The district court judge will undertake a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation if a written request for such review is filed within fourteen days after this order is filed.


Summaries of

United States v. Watt

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION
Jun 26, 2018
No. 18-CR-43-LRR (N.D. Iowa Jun. 26, 2018)
Case details for

United States v. Watt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EDDY WATT, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION

Date published: Jun 26, 2018

Citations

No. 18-CR-43-LRR (N.D. Iowa Jun. 26, 2018)