From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Watkins

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 9, 2015
2:14-cr-0112 TLN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2015)

Opinion


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW WATKINS, Defendant. No. 2:14-cr-0112 TLN United States District Court, E.D. California. March 9, 2015

          ORDER

          CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.

         This matter came on for hearing on March 9, 2015. The court previously ruled on defendant's motion for discovery (ECF Nos. 17, 22, 30). Assistant United States Attorneys Samuel Wong and Richard Bender appeared for the government. William Portonova and Lily Moallem appeared for the defendant. At the hearing, the parties advised the court of the status of the government's production in compliance with the court's order. Upon review of the filings, arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

Matters deemed withdrawn are based on the representations of the government that no such documents exist or that responsive documents which were ordered by the court to be produced have already been produced.

         1. Statements of Andrew Watkins prior to February 27, 2012:

         Denied.

         2. Digital storage data produced by Kenneth Watkins pursuant to grand jury subpoena:

         This matter is taken under submission on the representation that a search warrant will be imminently forthcoming. By close of business on March 10, 2015, the government shall notify defense counsel of the general timeline regarding inspection of the digital storage data.

         3. Sheriff's office audio and CAD reports:

         This request is withdrawn.

         4. Newly discovered Endangered Species Act investigation files:

         This matter is taken under submission pending review of documents submitted for in camera review. Said documents shall be submitted no later than March 10, 2015.

         5. Agent Mann's phone records and phone data:

         Denied as moot.

         6. Fish and Wildlife correspondence-three binders of ESA reports:

         This request is withdrawn.

         7. Fish and Wildlife Policies:

         This request is withdrawn.

         8. Use of unmarked vehicle:

         This request is withdrawn.

         9. Henthorn request:

         Denied as previously ordered.

         10. Photos taken by S.A. Mann of February 27, 2012 on McBride's digital camera:

         Denied as previously ordered.

         11. Watkin's cell phone records:

         Denied as previously ordered.

         12. Data from the Garmin device and the device itself:

         Denied as previously ordered.

         13. All documents concerning Arthur Beckwith:

         Denied as previously ordered.

         14. Site and violation reports based on information provided by Arthur Beckwith:

         Denied as previously ordered.

         15. Privilege log:

         This request is withdrawn.


Summaries of

United States v. Watkins

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Mar 9, 2015
2:14-cr-0112 TLN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Watkins

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW WATKINS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Mar 9, 2015

Citations

2:14-cr-0112 TLN (E.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2015)