From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Washignton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Sep 25, 2012
CRIMINAL NO. 12-CR-30059-DRH (S.D. Ill. Sep. 25, 2012)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 12-CR-30059-DRH

09-25-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, v. RONALD WASHINGTON, JR., DEFENDANT.


PRELIMINARY ORDER FOR FORFEITURE PURSUANT TO FED.R.CRIM.P.

32.2 WITH RESPECT TO RONALD WASHINGTON, JR.

HERNDON, Chief Judge:

In the Indictment filed in the above cause on February 23, 2012, the United States sought forfeiture of pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(a) of property possessed by defendant, Ronald Washington, Jr. The court, upon consideration of guilty plea in this matter, hereby finds that the following property is forfeitable and hereby orders forfeited the following property:

$40,391.00 in United States Currency seized from Defendant Ronald Washington, Jr. on August 5, 2011.

The United States shall provide notice of the forfeiture and the right of persons other than the defendant who have any claim or legal interest in any of the property to file a petition with the Court. The notice shall be provided in a manner consistent with Supplemental Rule G(4)(a) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions.

The notice shall state that the petition shall be set for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of the petitioner's alleged interest in the property, shall be signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury, and shall set forth the nature and extent of the petitioner's right, title, or interest in the forfeited property, the time and circumstances of the petitioner's acquisition of the right, title or interest in the property, any additional facts supporting the petitioner's claim, and the relief sought.

The United States shall, also to the extent practicable, provide direct written notice to any person known to have alleged an interest in the property that is the subject of the Order for Forfeiture, as a substitute for the published notice to those persons so notified.

Upon the filing a petition alleging the third-party interests in the property, the court may amend this order to resolve the claimed third-party interests.

The United States Marshal shall seize and reduce to his possession, if he has not already done so, the above-described property.

This Order, pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, shall become final with respect to Defendant Ronald Washington, Jr. at the time of the Defendant's sentencing, regardless of whether or not the rights of actual or potential third-party petitioners have been determined by that time. This Order shall be made part of the sentence of Defendant Ronald Washington, Jr. and shall be included in the Judgment imposed against the Defendant. This Order is a final order with respect to the Defendant, and this Order may be amended with respect to petitions filed by third-parties claiming an interest in the subject-matter forfeited property.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

David R. Herndon

Chief Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

United States v. Washignton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Sep 25, 2012
CRIMINAL NO. 12-CR-30059-DRH (S.D. Ill. Sep. 25, 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Washignton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF, v. RONALD WASHINGTON, JR., DEFENDANT.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Date published: Sep 25, 2012

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 12-CR-30059-DRH (S.D. Ill. Sep. 25, 2012)