From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Volen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 8, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-cr-00294-MCE (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)

Opinion

CASE NO. 2:12-cr-00294-MCE

03-08-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BART WAYNE VOLEN, GREGORY SCOTT BAKER, and DARRELL PATRICK HINZ, Defendants.

MATTHEW G. JACOBS Attorney for Defendant BART WAYNE VOLEN MICHAEL M. BECKWITH Assistant U.S. Attorney THOMAS A. JOHNSON Attorney for Defendant GREGORY SCOTT BAKER WILLIAM J. PORTANOVA Attorney for Defendant DARRELL PATRICK HINZ


MATTHEW G. JACOBS (SBN 122066)
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2400
Sacramento, CA 95814-4428
Tel: 916.930.3200
Fax: 916.930.3201
Attorneys for Defendant
BART WAYNE VOLEN

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS

CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME

UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; ORDER

THEREON

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED between the defendants and the United States of America, by and through their undersigned counsel, that the status conference currently set for March 7, 2013 at 9:00 a.m, should be continued to May 9, 2013 at 9:00 a.m., and that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded during that period.

The reason for the continuance is that the government recently produced approximately 24,000 pages of discovery to the defense (in addition to its initial production of approximately 12,000 pages), and anticipates producing and/or making available many more thousands of pages of discovery. Counsel for each defendant needs more time to review the discovery, discuss additional discovery with the government, research a number of issues, and discuss those matters with his client. In addition, counsel for Mr. Volen has recently submitted a comprehensive discovery request to the government which the government needs to evaluate and respond to.

Moreover, on November 1, 2012, counsel for Mr. Baker filed a motion for authorization of service of a subpoena pursuant to Rule 17(c), and that motion is currently set for hearing on March 21, 2013.

The parties therefore stipulate that the requested continuance should be granted to provide counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv), and for the pendency of Mr. Baker's discovery motion, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(D). The parties further stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).

The undersigned counsel for the other parties have authorized Mr. Jacobs to sign this stipulation for them.

_______________

MATTHEW G. JACOBS

Attorney for Defendant

BART WAYNE VOLEN

_______________

MICHAEL M. BECKWITH

Assistant U.S. Attorney

_______________

THOMAS A. JOHNSON

Attorney for Defendant

GREGORY SCOTT BAKER

_______________

WILLIAM J. PORTANOVA

Attorney for Defendant

DARRELL PATRICK HINZ

ORDER

The status conference currently set for March 7, 2013 at 9:00 a.m, should be continued to May 9, 2013 at 9:00 a.m., and that time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded during that period.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Volen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 8, 2013
CASE NO. 2:12-cr-00294-MCE (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Volen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BART WAYNE VOLEN, GREGORY SCOTT…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 8, 2013

Citations

CASE NO. 2:12-cr-00294-MCE (E.D. Cal. Mar. 8, 2013)