Opinion
21-20268
06-13-2022
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:20-CR-601-1
Before Higginbotham, Higginson, and Duncan, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam
The attorney appointed to represent Juan Miguel Rayas Vivia on appeal has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Rayas Vivia has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. In light of our recent opinion in United States v. Martinez, 15 F.4th 1179, 1180-81 (5th Cir. 2021) we concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4.