From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Villalobos

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 20, 2022
CR 22-00242-FWS (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2022)

Opinion

CR 22-00242-FWS

12-20-2022

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AARON VILLALOBOS, Defendant.


ORDER OF DETENTION

ALKA SAGAR, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

I.

On December 20, 2022, Defendant made his initial appearance in this district on the indictment filed in this matter. Deputy Federal Public Defender Adam Olin was appointed to represent Defendant. The government was represented by Assistant United States Attorney David Williams. Defendant did not seek release on bond.

On November 2, 2022, Defendant made his initial appearance on the bench warrant issued in this district in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

[X] On motion of the Government [18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(1)] in a case allegedly involving a narcotics or controlled substance offense with maximum sentence of ten or more years.

[X] On motion by the Government or on the Court's own motion [18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2)] in a case allegedly involving a serious risk that the defendant will flee.

The Court concludes that the Government is entitled to a rebuttable presumption that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the defendant's appearance as required and the safety or any person or the community [18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(2)].

II.

The Court finds that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure: [X] the appearance of the defendant as required.

[X] the safety of any person or the community.

III.

The Court has considered: (a) the nature and circumstances of the offense(s) charged, including whether the offense is a crime of violence, a Federal crime of terrorism, or involves a minor victim or a controlled substance, firearm, explosive, or destructive device; (b) the weight of evidence against the defendant; (c) the history and characteristics of the defendant; and (d) the nature and seriousness of the danger to any person or the community. [18 U.S.C. § 3142(g)] The Court also considered all the evidence adduced at the hearing and the arguments of counsel, and the report and recommendation of the U.S. Pretrial Services Agency.

IV.

The Court bases its conclusions on the following:

As to risk of non-appearance:

[X] Unrebutted Presumption.

As to danger to the community:

[X] allegations in the indictment
[X] Unrebutted Presumption.

V.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendant be detained until trial. The defendant will be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for confinement in a corrections facility separate, to the extent practicable, from persons awaiting or serving sentences or being held in custody pending appeal. The defendant will be afforded reasonable opportunity for private consultation with counsel. On order of a Court of the United States or on request of any attorney for the Government, the person in charge of the corrections facility in which defendant is confined will deliver the defendant to a United States Marshal for the purpose of an appearance in connection with a court proceeding. [18 U.S.C. § 3142(i)]


Summaries of

United States v. Villalobos

United States District Court, Central District of California
Dec 20, 2022
CR 22-00242-FWS (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2022)
Case details for

United States v. Villalobos

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. AARON VILLALOBOS, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Dec 20, 2022

Citations

CR 22-00242-FWS (C.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2022)