From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Ventura

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 23, 2013
No. 2:11-cr-354 LKK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cr-354 LKK

04-23-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EVARISTO ARREOLA VENTURA, and OSCAR GOMEZ GORIBALDO, Defendants.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Defender BENJAMIN GALLOWAY Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant OSCAR GOMEZ GORIBALDO DINA L. SANTOS Attorney for Defendant EVARISTO ARREOLA-VENTURA BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney TODD LERAS Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar# 87692
Acting Federal Defender
BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar# 214897
Assistant Federal Defender
801 I Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone (916) 498-5700
Attorney for Defendant
OSCAR GOMEZ GORIBALDO

STIPULATION AND ORDER

CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE

AND EXCLUDING TIME


DATE: June 11, 2013

JUDGE: Hon. Lawrence K. Karlton

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through TODD LERAS, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant OSCAR GOMEZ GORIBALDO by and through his counsel, BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender and defendant EVARISTO ARREOLA-VENTURA, by and through his attorney, DINA L. SANTOS, that the status conference set for Tuesday, April 23, 2013, be continued to Tuesday, June 11, 2013, at 9:15 a.m., for status conference.

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

It is further stipulated that the time period from the date of this stipulation, through and including the date of the new status conference, June 11, 2013, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv)and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare], and that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

____________________________

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

OSCAR GOMEZ GORIBALDO

____________________________

DINA L. SANTOS

Attorney for Defendant

EVARISTO ARREOLA-VENTURA

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

____________________________

TODD LERAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. It is hereby ordered that the presently set April 23, 2013, status conference shall be continued to June 11, 2013, at 9:15 a.m. It is further ordered that the time period from the date of the parties' stipulation, through and including the date of the new status conference hearing, June 11, 2013, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) and Local Code T4 [reasonable time for defense counsel to prepare].

Based on the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time for effective preparation taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court specifically finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

____________________________

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON

SENIOR JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

United States v. Ventura

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 23, 2013
No. 2:11-cr-354 LKK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Ventura

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. EVARISTO ARREOLA VENTURA, and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 23, 2013

Citations

No. 2:11-cr-354 LKK (E.D. Cal. Apr. 23, 2013)