From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Vaughn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Dec 31, 2013
Case No. 3:08-cr-116 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 31, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:08-cr-116 Also Case No 3:13-cv-403

12-31-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH VAUGHN, Defendant.


District Judge Walter Herbert Rice

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #386), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

It is hereby ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate be dismissed with prejudice because (1) the United States complied with Alleyne in its handling of this case the required facts of the mandatory minimum sentence were charged in the indictment and admitted by the Defendant and (2) in any event Alleyne does not apply retroactively to cases decided before June 17, 2013.

_________________

Walter Herbert Rice

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Vaughn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Dec 31, 2013
Case No. 3:08-cr-116 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 31, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Vaughn

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH VAUGHN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Dec 31, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:08-cr-116 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 31, 2013)