From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Vargas-Zuniga

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 7, 2020
No. 19-10359 (9th Cir. Aug. 7, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-10359

08-07-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MIGUEL RAMON VARGAS-ZUNIGA, Defendant-Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

D.C. No. 2:19-cr-00816-SMB-1 MEMORANDUM Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
Susan M. Brnovich, District Judge, Presiding Before: SCHROEDER, HAWKINS, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Miguel Ramon Vargas-Zuniga appeals from the district court's judgment and challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Vargas-Zuniga's counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Vargas-Zuniga the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Vargas-Zuniga waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss the appeal. See id. at 988.

Counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

United States v. Vargas-Zuniga

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Aug 7, 2020
No. 19-10359 (9th Cir. Aug. 7, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Vargas-Zuniga

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MIGUEL RAMON…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 7, 2020

Citations

No. 19-10359 (9th Cir. Aug. 7, 2020)