From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Vance

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 22, 2019
No. 18-7304 (4th Cir. Apr. 22, 2019)

Opinion

No. 18-7304

04-22-2019

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JACK EARL VANCE, Defendant - Appellant.

Jack Earl Vance, Appellant Pro Se. Traci Michelle Cook, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (2:05-cr-00043-JPB-1) Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jack Earl Vance, Appellant Pro Se. Traci Michelle Cook, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Jack Earl Vance appeals the district court's omnibus order denying the various postjudgment motions Vance filed seeking, among other relief, the production of evidence presented in his federal criminal proceedings and trial transcripts. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Vance, No. 2:05-cr-00043-JPB-1 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 9, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Vance

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 22, 2019
No. 18-7304 (4th Cir. Apr. 22, 2019)
Case details for

United States v. Vance

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. JACK EARL VANCE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 22, 2019

Citations

No. 18-7304 (4th Cir. Apr. 22, 2019)