From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Valenzuela

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2013
2:12-cr-358 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2013)

Opinion

2:12-cr-358 GEB

01-10-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ADRES VALENZUELA and ARISTEO HERRERA, Defendants.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar# 87692 Acting Federal Defender BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar# 214897 Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant ANDRES VALENZUELA DINA SANTOS Attorney for Defendant ARISTEO HERRERA BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DANIEL McCONKIE Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar# 87692
Acting Federal Defender
BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar# 214897
Assistant Federal Defender
Attorney for Defendant
ANDRES VALENZUELA

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND

EXCLUDE TIME


DATE: February 22, 2013

JUDGE: Hon. Garland E. Burrell

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through JASON HITT, Assistant U.S. Attorney; defendant ADRES VALENZUELA by and through his counsel, BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender; and defendant ARISTO HERRERA, by and through his counsel, DINA SANTOS, that the status conference set for Friday, January 25, 2013 be continued to Friday, February 22, 2013 at 9:00 a.m.

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for February 22, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

________________________

BENJAMIN GALLOWAY

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

ANDRES VALENZUELA

________________________

DINA SANTOS

Attorney for Defendant

ARISTEO HERRERA

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

________________________

DANIEL McCONKIE

Assistant U.S. Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court orders that the time from the date of the parties stipulation, up to and including February 22, 2013, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) T4 (reasonable time for counsel to prepare). It is further ordered that the January 25, 2013 status conference shall be continued until February 22, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.

________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Valenzuela

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 10, 2013
2:12-cr-358 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Valenzuela

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ADRES VALENZUELA and ARISTEO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 10, 2013

Citations

2:12-cr-358 GEB (E.D. Cal. Jan. 10, 2013)