From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Valdez

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 8, 2021
20-cr-601 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 8, 2021)

Opinion

20-cr-601 (PKC)

10-08-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. YONATHAN JUNIOR GARCIA VALDEZ, et al., Defendant.


ORDER

P. Kevin Castel United States District Judge

The October 12, 2021 conference in this six-defendant case was set on July 15, 2021. The process of securing production of detained defendants from multiple facilities is a complex, difficult and time-consuming task. Has counsel sought the consent of other defense counsel and the government for an adjournment of this conference to an agreed upon date in the future? Has counsel endeavored to secure coverage for the October 12 conference from other CJA counsel and obtained the consent of his client? When did counsel learn that the 4-week trial was scheduled for October 12? Perhaps a small point but counsel's letter does not even favor the Court with an indication of whether counsel consents to exclusion of time under the Speedy Trial Act. Application DENIED without prejudice.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Valdez

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 8, 2021
20-cr-601 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 8, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Valdez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. YONATHAN JUNIOR GARCIA VALDEZ, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 8, 2021

Citations

20-cr-601 (PKC) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 8, 2021)