Summary
finding no strong-arm tactics where officers were armed but did not display their weapons
Summary of this case from United States v. EdderhoffOpinion
Criminal No. 12-299 (MJD/LIB)
03-18-2013
United States of America, Plaintiff, v. William Robert Upshaw, Defendant.
ORDER
The above-entitled matter comes before the Court on Defendant's objections to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated February 5, 2013. Defendant objects to the legal conclusions set forth in the Report and Recommendation.
Pursuant to statute, the Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Local Rule 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure [Doc. No. 12] is DENIED; and
2. Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions and Answers [Doc. No. 13] is DENIED.
_______________
Michael J. Davis
Chief Judge
United States District Court