From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Udall

UNITED STATES DISTPICT COUPT FOR THE EASTEPN DISTPICT OF CALIFOPNIA
Feb 21, 2013
No. 1:10-cr-0317 AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:10-cr-0317 AWI-BAM

02-21-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMEPICA, Plaintiff, v. TODD UDALL, Defendant.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNEP United States Attorney DAVID L. GAPPA Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for Plaintiff JOSEPH SCHLESINGEP Acting Federal Defender FPANCINE ZEPEDA Assistant Federal Defender Attorneys for Defendant TODD UDALL


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692
Acting Federal Defender
FPANCINE ZEPEDA, Bar #91175
Assistant Federal Defender
Designated Counsel for Service
Attorneys for Defendant
TODD UDALL

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING


DATE: April 8, 2013

JUDGE: Hon. Barbara A. McAuliffe

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto, through their respective counsel, that the status conference hearing in the above-captioned matter now set for February 25, 2012, may be continued to April 8, 2013 at 1:00 P.M. before Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe.

This continuance is at the request of counsel for defendant. Counsel needs additional time for case investigation and preparation prior to hearing. The requested continuance will conserve time and resources for both counsel and the court. Assistant United States Attorney David L. Gappa has no objection to this request.

The parties agree that time shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) in that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, including, but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation.

BENJAMIN B. WAGNEP

United States Attorney

By: ________

DAVID L. GAPPA

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

JOSEPH SCHLESINGEP

Acting Federal Defender

By: ________

FPANCINE ZEPEDA

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorneys for Defendant

TODD UDALL

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. Time is hereby excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B) in that the ends of justice served by the continuance outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Barbara A. McAuliffe

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Udall

UNITED STATES DISTPICT COUPT FOR THE EASTEPN DISTPICT OF CALIFOPNIA
Feb 21, 2013
No. 1:10-cr-0317 AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Udall

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMEPICA, Plaintiff, v. TODD UDALL, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTPICT COUPT FOR THE EASTEPN DISTPICT OF CALIFOPNIA

Date published: Feb 21, 2013

Citations

No. 1:10-cr-0317 AWI-BAM (E.D. Cal. Feb. 21, 2013)