From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tuipulotu

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 13, 2024
4:24-mj-70198 MAG (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-mj-70198 MAG

05-13-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NAIKA TUIPULOTU, Defendant.

JODI LINKER Federal Public Defender Northern District of California JOYCE LEAVITT Assistant Federal Public Defender ISMAIL J. RAMSEY United States Attorney Northern District of California JONAH ROSS Assistant United States Attorney


JODI LINKER Federal Public Defender Northern District of California

JOYCE LEAVITT Assistant Federal Public Defender

ISMAIL J. RAMSEY United States Attorney Northern District of California

JONAH ROSS Assistant United States Attorney

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, EXCLUDE TIME, AND EXTEND DEADLINES UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND FED R. CRIM. P. 5.1 TO JUNE 7, 2024

HON. DONNA M. RYU, Chief United States Magistrate Judge

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action that the status hearing for defendant Naikano Tuipulotu scheduled for May 15, 2024, before the duty magistrate judge, be continued to Friday, June 7, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. before the duty magistrate for status or arraignment on information. The reason for the continuance is as follows: Defense counsel received additional discovery on Friday, May 10, 2024, and is still reviewing it. Counsel needs time to complete its review and continue to discuss the discovery and case in general with her client. The parties also anticipate discussing a potential resolution which may result in a waiver of indictment and arraignment on an information. The continuance is sought under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties agree and stipulate that the time until June 7, 2024, should be excluded, under 18 U.S.C. §3161(H)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), for effective preparation of counsel because the ends of justice served by the granting of the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy and public trial for the reasons described above.

The parties further stipulate that, with the consent of the defendant, there is good cause for extending the time limits for a preliminary hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 and for extending the 30-day time period for an indictment under the Speedy Trial Act for the reasons discussed above. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1; 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, EXCLUDE TIME, AND EXTEND DEADLINES UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND FED R. CRIM. P. 5.1 TO JUNE 7, 2024

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status hearing for defendant Naikano Tuipulotu, currently scheduled for May 15, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., is continued to June 7, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., before the duty magistrate for status.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time until June 7, 2024, is hereby excluded from the Speedy Trial Act, under 18 U.S.C. §3161(H)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), for effective preparation taking into account due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy and public trial. The Court further finds good cause for extending the time limits for a preliminary hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 and extending the 30-day time period for an indictment under the Speedy Trial Act for the reasons discussed above. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1; 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Tuipulotu

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 13, 2024
4:24-mj-70198 MAG (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Tuipulotu

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NAIKA TUIPULOTU, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 13, 2024

Citations

4:24-mj-70198 MAG (N.D. Cal. May. 13, 2024)