From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tuipulotu

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 19, 2024
4:24-mj-70198 MAG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2024)

Opinion

4:24-mj-70198 MAG

03-19-2024

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NAIKANO TUIPULOTU, Defendant.

JODI LINKER Federal Public Defender Northern District of California JOYCE LEAVITT Assistant Federal Public Defender ISMAIL J. RAMSEY United States Attorney Northern District of California JONAH ROSS Assistant United States Attorney Counsel for Defendant TUIPULOTU


JODI LINKER Federal Public Defender Northern District of California

JOYCE LEAVITT Assistant Federal Public Defender

ISMAIL J. RAMSEY United States Attorney Northern District of California

JONAH ROSS Assistant United States Attorney

Counsel for Defendant TUIPULOTU

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, EXCLUDE TIME, AND EXTEND DEADLINES UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND FED R. CRIM. P. 5.1 TO APRIL 3, 2024

HON. DONNA M. RYU CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties to this action that the status hearing for defendant Naikano Tuipulotu scheduled for March 20, 2024, before the duty magistrate judge, be continued to Wednesday, April 3, 2024, at 10:30 a.m. before the duty magistrate for status or arraignment on information. The reason for the continuance is as follows: Defense counsel has received a second set of discovery on March 18, 2024, from the government which includes surveillance videos cell phone tower information and needs time to review the discovery and determine what investigation may be needed. In addition, counsel needs time to discuss the discovery with her client. The continuance is sought under the Speedy Trial Act. The parties agree and stipulate that the time until April 3, 2024, should be excluded, under 18 U.S.C. §3161(H)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), for effective preparation of counsel because the ends of justice served by the granting of the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy and public trial for the reasons described above.

The parties further stipulate that, with the consent of the defendant, there is good cause for extending the time limits for a preliminary hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 and for extending the 30-day time period for an indictment under the Speedy Trial Act for the reasons discussed above. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1; 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, EXCLUDE TIME, AND EXTEND DEADLINES UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND FED R. CRIM. P. 5.1 TO APRIL 3, 2024

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the status hearing for defendant Naikano Tuipulotu, currently scheduled for March 20, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., is continued to April 3, 2024, at 10:30 a.m., before the duty magistrate for status.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time until April 3, 2024, is hereby excluded from the Speedy Trial Act, under 18 U.S.C. §3161(H)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), for effective preparation taking into account due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice served by the granting of the continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy and public trial. The Court further finds good cause for extending the time limits for a preliminary hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 and extending the 30-day time period for an indictment under the Speedy Trial Act for the reasons discussed above. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1; 18 U.S.C. § 3161(b).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Tuipulotu

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Mar 19, 2024
4:24-mj-70198 MAG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2024)
Case details for

United States v. Tuipulotu

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NAIKANO TUIPULOTU, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Mar 19, 2024

Citations

4:24-mj-70198 MAG (N.D. Cal. Mar. 19, 2024)