United States v. Roberson

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff(s) v. DARRELL LEE ROBERSON Defendant(s)

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 28, 2013

Case No: 3:12cr092(6) (S.D. Ohio Jan. 28, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:12cr092(2)

01-28-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BLAINE DELAND CLARK, Defendant.

WALTER H. RICE

JUDGE WALTER H. RICE

ENTRY FINDING DEFENDANT IN VIOLATION OF BOND BUT NOT

REVOKING SAME; DEFENDANT CONTINUED ON BOND, SUBJECT

TO IDENTICAL CONDITIONS; RIGHT OF APPEAL EXPLAINED AND

UNDERSTOOD

On January 15, 2013, the Defendant, having previously been found in violation of his bond set and met on November 13, 2012, appeared in open Court for final disposition.

Based upon the record made on the aforesaid January 15, 2013, while the Defendant was found in violation of his bond, the Court declined to revoke same. Rather, the Defendant was continued on bond, subject to the same conditions as previously set.

Specifically, the Court held in abeyance the third allegation set forth in the Petition of December 20, 2012 (Doc. #124), to which a denial has been lodged, and declined to revoke the Defendant's bond on the four allegations admitted.

Following the above, the Defendant was orally explained his right of appeal, and he indicated an understanding of same.

__________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies to: Counsel of record
Patrick Kennedy, U.S. Pretrial Services Officer