Opinion
21-cv-0200 KWR/SMV
08-20-2021
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA for the use of CONTRERAS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. TRAVELERS CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA and FLINTCO, LLC, Defendants.
SCHEDULING ORDER
STEPHAN M. VIDMAR, United States Magistrate Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court on a telephonic Rule 16 scheduling conference held on August 20, 2021. The parties' Joint Status Report and Provisional Discovery Plan [Doc. 19] is adopted, except as modified below. The Court will permit discovery as follows:
1. 25 Interrogatories by each party to any other party;
2. 25 Requests for Production by each party to any other party;
3. No limit on the number of Requests for Admission served by each party at this time;
4. 4 depositions per side;
5. Depositions limited to 4 hours of questioning on the record unless extended by agreement of the parties, except depositions of parties and experts, which are limited to 7 hours on the record unless extended by agreement of the parties.
Requests for Admission are subject to the deadline for termination of discovery.
In accordance with the Civil Justice Expense and Delay Reduction Plan adopted in compliance with the Civil Justice Reform Act, and pursuant to Title 28 U.S.C. § 473(a)(1), this case is assigned to a “complex” (210-day) track classification. The Court sets the following case management deadlines:
Plaintiff moves to amend the pleadings or join additional parties by:
October 1, 2021
Defendant moves to amend the pleadings or join additional parties by:3
October 15, 2021
Plaintiff and counter-Plaintiff disclose experts and provide expert reports or summary disclosures by:
January 18, 2022
Defendant and counter-Defendant disclose experts and provide expert reports or summary disclosures by:4
February 16, 2022
Termination of discovery:
March 18, 2022
April 7, 2022
April 18, 2022
Proposed Pretrial Order due from Plaintiff to Defendant by:
June 3, 2022
Proposed Pretrial Order due from Defendant to Court by:
June 17, 2022
Herein, the terms “Plaintiff” and “Defendant” encompass both singular and plural meanings.
Amendment must comply with Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a).
The parties must disclose every expert witness who is expected to testify, even if the expert is not required to submit an expert report. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B)-(C); D.N.M.LR-Civ. 26.3(b).
See D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7 for motion practice requirements and timing of responses and replies. The discovery motions deadline does not extend the 21-day time limit in D.N.M.LR-Civ. 26.6 (Party served with objection to discovery request must file motion to compel within 21 days of service of objection. Failure to file motion within 21 days constitutes acceptance of the objection.).
This deadline applies to motions related to the admissibility of experts or expert testimony that may require a Daubert hearing, but otherwise does not apply to motions in limine. The Court will set a motions in limine deadline in a separate order.
Discovery shall not be reopened, nor shall case management deadlines be modified, except by an order of the Court upon a showing of good cause. Discovery must be completed on or before the discovery deadline. Accordingly, service of written discovery is timely only if the responses are due prior to the discovery deadline. A notice to take deposition is timely only if the deposition takes place prior to the discovery deadline. The pendency of dispositive motions does not stay discovery.
IT IS SO ORDERED.