From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Torres

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 14, 2021
20cr608 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 14, 2021)

Opinion

20cr608 (DLC)

07-14-2021

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AQUILINO TORRES, Defendant.


ORDER

DENISE COTE, DISTRICT JUDGE

The Court has learned that, after the jury delivered its verdict and was released, a paralegal associated with defense counsel attempted to question members of the jury regarding their verdict. The Second Circuit has held that "[p]ost-trial questioning of jurors must only be conducted under the strict supervision and control of the court," and that "at a minimum, notice to opposing counsel and the court should be given in all cases before engaging in any post-verdict inquiry of jurors." United States v. Schwarz, 283 F.3d 76, 98 (2d Cir. 2002) (citation omitted). Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the parties, their counsel, and their agents shall not contact the jurors in this case. If a party wishes to conduct post-verdict interviews of jurors, it must provide notice to opposing counsel and the Court and receive leave of Court before doing so.


Summaries of

United States v. Torres

United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jul 14, 2021
20cr608 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 14, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Torres

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AQUILINO TORRES, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of New York

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

20cr608 (DLC) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 14, 2021)