From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANGELO DIVISION
Dec 17, 2020
CASE NO. 6:20-CR-00020-H-BU (N.D. Tex. Dec. 17, 2020)

Opinion

CASE NO. 6:20-CR-00020-H-BU

12-17-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AARON DAVID TORRES (1)


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted to the court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3).

Under the authority granted by the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act), the Chief Judge for the Northern District of Texas issued Special Order 13-9 in which, among other things, she specifically found that felony pleas under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 cannot be conducted in person without seriously jeopardizing public health and safety. As a result, Special Order 13-9 authorized the use of video teleconferencing for the taking of felony guilty pleas in particular cases in which the district judge has made a finding that the plea cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice. Upon the joint motion of both parties, the district judge has made such a finding. Accordingly, the defendant appeared via video teleconference before the undersigned United States magistrate judge who addressed the defendant in open court and informed the defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The defendant pled guilty (under a plea bargain agreement with the government) to Count One of the One-count Indictment charging defendant with a violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(2) and 2252A(b)(1) -Distribution and Receipt of Child Pornography. The undersigned magistrate judge finds the following:

1. The defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge subject to final approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge;

2. The defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each essential element of the offense(s) charged and penalties;

3. The defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea agreement supplement;

4. The defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right to appear before a United States district judge;

5. The defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily;

6. The defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty;

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of guilty.

Although I have conducted these proceedings and accepted the defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if the defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) days of today.

Based on the above, I recommend that the defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that the defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly. The Clerk will furnish a copy of this Order to each of attorney of record.

Signed on: December 17, 2020

/s/_________

JOHN R. PARKER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANGELO DIVISION
Dec 17, 2020
CASE NO. 6:20-CR-00020-H-BU (N.D. Tex. Dec. 17, 2020)
Case details for

United States v. Torres

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. AARON DAVID TORRES (1)

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANGELO DIVISION

Date published: Dec 17, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. 6:20-CR-00020-H-BU (N.D. Tex. Dec. 17, 2020)