From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Oct 7, 2013
CRIMINAL NO. H-93-210-1 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 7, 2013)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. H-93-210-1

2013-10-07

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROMEL WILLIAM TORRES, Defendant.


ORDER

The defendant and petitioner, Romel William Torres, asks the court to "correct simple clerical errors" on the judgment and commitment order dated September 26, 1994. Torres relies on Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. He asks that the reference to 18 U.S.C. § 1956(g) in count 8 be changed to 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). (Docket Entry No. 720). In response, the government points out that Rule 36 is normally used to correct a written judgment of sentence if it is inconsistent with the judge's oral sentence. The government also points out that the judgment in this case is accurate. The statute itself had a typographical error that was corrected in 1994. But the indictment was returned before the correction. The judgment citation to the statute then in effect is correct.

Based on the information submitted by the government, there is no basis to grant the motion. It is denied.

SIGNED on October 7, 2013, at Houston, Texas.

____________________________

Lee H. Rosenthal

United States District Judge


Summaries of

United States v. Torres

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Oct 7, 2013
CRIMINAL NO. H-93-210-1 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 7, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Torres

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROMEL WILLIAM TORRES, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Oct 7, 2013

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. H-93-210-1 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 7, 2013)