From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Torre

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 13, 2013
2:13-cr-121 TLN (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2013)

Opinion

          HEATHER E. WILLIAMS, Bar #122664, Federal Defender, BENJAMIN D. GALLOWAY, Bar #214897, Assistant Federal Defender, Designated Counsel for Service Sacramento, California, Attorney for Defendant ROBERTO CARLOS DE LA TORRE.

          BENJAMIN WAGNER, United States Attorney, DANIEL McCONKIE, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Attorney for Plaintiff.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDE TIME

          TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, DANIEL McCONKIE, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and BENJAMIN GALLOWAY, Assistant Federal Defender, attorney for Defendant JORGE LUIS HERNANDEZ, aka ROBERTO CARLOS DE LA TORRE, that the status conference set for Thursday, June 20, 2013 be continued to Thursday, August 1, 2013 at 9:30 a.m.

         The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery with the defendant, to examine possible defenses and to continue investigating the facts of the case.

         The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

         Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for August 1, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

          ORDER

         The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

         The Court orders that the time from the date of the parties stipulation, up to and including August 1, 2013, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv) T4 (reasonable time for counsel to prepare). It is further ordered that the June 20, 2013 status conference shall be continued until August 1, 2013, at 9:30 a.m.


Summaries of

United States v. Torre

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jun 13, 2013
2:13-cr-121 TLN (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Torre

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ROBERTO CARLOS DE LA TORRE…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jun 13, 2013

Citations

2:13-cr-121 TLN (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2013)