From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tidd

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 29, 2014
582 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 13-7000

08-29-2014

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GARY LEE TIDD, Defendant - Appellant.

Gary Lee Tidd, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Shailika K. Shah, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:10-cr-00043-F-1; 7:12-cv-00106-F) Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gary Lee Tidd, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Shailika K. Shah, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gary Lee Tidd appeals the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. We granted a certificate of appealability on the issue of whether Tidd raised a viable claim of ineffective assistance of counsel based on counsel's alleged failure to comply with Tidd's direction and note an appeal. The Government concedes that Tidd's allegations stated a potentially meritorious claim of ineffective assistance and that the district court's dismissal of that claim was premature in the absence of an evidentiary hearing. Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 477 (2000); United States v. Oliver, 865 F.2d 600, 601 (4th Cir. 1989); see also United States v. Poindexter, 492 F.3d 263, 269 (4th Cir. 2007); United States v. Peak, 992 F.2d 39, 42 (4th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, we vacate the district court's order dismissing Tidd's § 2255 motion and remand for an evidentiary hearing on whether counsel neglected Tidd's direction to appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conclusions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED


Summaries of

United States v. Tidd

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 29, 2014
582 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

United States v. Tidd

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. GARY LEE TIDD…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 29, 2014

Citations

582 F. App'x 242 (4th Cir. 2014)

Citing Cases

Williams v. United States

Williams has stated a claim. See United States v. Tidd, 582 F. App'x 242, 242 (4th Cir. 2014) (per curiam)…

Toney v. United States

Toney, however, now disputes what he and counsel discussed, contends that the discussion does not constitute…