From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Thompson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 27, 2015
2:14-CR-0036-TLN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)

Opinion

          WILLIAM J. PORTANOVA Attorney for Randy Lee Thompson.

          MATTHEW G. MORRIS, Assistant United States Attorney.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

          TROY L. NUNLEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         With the Court’s permission, it is hereby stipulated between the parties, William J. Portanova, counsel for the defendant herein, and Matthew G. Morris Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for the plaintiff, that the status conference scheduled for January 29, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. be continued until March 5, 2015 at 9:30 a.m.

         Defense counsel has recently received highly technical engineering discovery and requires additional time to review these materials prior to discussing the case with the government.

         In addition, the parties stipulate that the time between January 29, 2015 and March 5, 2015 be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act (18 U.S.C. section 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv)) and local code T4 to give counsel time to prepare.

         The parties stipulate that the ends of justice to be served by granting this defense request for a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

         IT IS SO STIPULATED.

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

United States v. Thompson

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Jan 27, 2015
2:14-CR-0036-TLN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Thompson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RANDY LEE THOMPSON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 27, 2015

Citations

2:14-CR-0036-TLN (E.D. Cal. Jan. 27, 2015)