From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Thomas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Mar 18, 2016
642 F. App'x 336 (5th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-30295

03-18-2016

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANTHONY R. THOMAS, Defendant-Appellant


Summary Calendar Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 2:12-CR-266-1 Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. --------

The attorney appointed to represent Anthony R. Thomas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Thomas has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel's brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel's assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


Summaries of

United States v. Thomas

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Mar 18, 2016
642 F. App'x 336 (5th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

United States v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ANTHONY R. THOMAS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 18, 2016

Citations

642 F. App'x 336 (5th Cir. 2016)

Citing Cases

United States v. Thomas

On April 4, 2017, Thomas, proceeding pro se, filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence…

United States v. Thomas

Thomas argues that: (1) his trial counsel failed to properly investigate facts of the case; (2) his trial…