From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Thomas

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 14, 2021
21-cr-93 (JRT/TNL) (D. Minn. Jul. 14, 2021)

Opinion

21-cr-93 (JRT/TNL)

07-14-2021

United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Robbin Allen Thomas, Defendant.


ORDER

TONY N. LEUNG, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Robbin Allen Thomas's Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions. (ECF No. 29.) Defendant has also filed a Statement of Facts in Support of Exclusion of Time Under the Speedy Trial Act. (ECF No. 30.) Defendant requests a two-month extension of the motion filing deadline because he “has been focused on an appeal of the detention order and is awaiting medical records.” (ECF No. 29 at 1; see also ECF No. 30 at 1 (noting that these medical records have been ordered).) Defendant also states that he needs additional time “to review discovery and discuss potential pretrial motions” with his counsel. (ECF No. 30 at 1.) By way of e-mail correspondence, the Government indicated that it does not object to this motion.

Additionally, beginning on March 13, 2020, and continuing thereafter, the Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief District Judge for the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota, has issued a series of General Orders in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic, addressing, among other things, criminal proceedings and trials.On April 29, 2021, Chief Judge Tunheim entered General Order No. 28, which allows limited in-person proceedings to start on May 3, 2021, for defendants who decline to consent to conducting the proceeding using videoconferencing, or telephone conferencing if videoconferencing is not reasonably available. See generally In re: Updated Guidance to Court Operations Under the Exigent Circumstances Created by COVID-19 , Gen. Order No. 28 (D. Minn. Apr. 29, 2021). General Order No. 28 states that because only limited in-person proceedings may be held each day, criminal proceedings may be continued until the date that the criminal proceeding takes place.

All General Orders related to the COVID-19 pandemic may be found on the Court's website at https://www.mnd.uscourts.gov/coronavirus-covid-19-guidance.

General Order No. 28 continues to encourage the use of videoconferencing in criminal proceedings and states that, with the defendant's consent, criminal proceedings will be conducted by videoconferencing, or telephone conferencing if videoconferencing is not reasonably available. General Order No. 28 further provides that the presiding judge will enter orders in individual cases to extend deadlines and exclude time under the Speedy Trial Act to address delays attributable to COVID-19. Accordingly, should Defendant file pretrial motions, counsel shall also file a letter indicating whether Defendant consents to a motions hearing by videoconference. (See also ECF No. 14; ECF No. 28 at 2.)

See also General Order No. 29, which went into effect on June 23, 2021, vacated General Order No. 27, and extended the Court's authorization to conduct certain criminal proceedings via video or telephone conference pursuant to the CARES Act “[b]ecause the emergency created by the COVID-19 outbreak continues to materially affect the functioning of court operations in the District of Minnesota.” In re: Updated Guidance to Court Operations Under the Exigent Circumstances Created by COVID-19 , Gen. Order No. 29 (D. Minn. June 17, 2021).

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h), this Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and Defendant in a speedy trial and such continuance is necessary to provide Defendant and his counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation and to make efficient use of the parties' resources. Based on all the files, records, and proceedings herein, and noting that there is no opposition to the motion, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Pretrial Motions (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED.

2. The period of time from July 8 through October 15, 2021, shall be excluded from Speedy Trial Act computations in this case.

3. All motions in the above-entitled case shall be filed and served consistent with Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 12(b) and 47 on or before September 8, 2021. D. Minn. LR 12.1(c)(1). Two courtesy copies of all motions and responses shall be delivered directly to the chambers of Magistrate Judge Leung.

4. Should Defendant file pretrial motions, counsel shall also file a letter on or before September 8, 2021, indicating whether that defendant consents to a motions hearing by videoconference.

5. Counsel shall electronically file a letter on or before September 8, 2021, if no motions will be filed and there is no need for hearing.

6. All responses to motions shall be filed by September 22, 2021. D. Minn. LR 12.1(c)(2).

7. Any Notice of Intent to Call Witnesses shall be filed by September 22, 2021. D. Minn. LR. 12.1(c)(3)(A).

8. Any Responsive Notice of Intent to Call Witnesses shall be filed by September 27, 2021. D. Minn. LR 12.1(c)(3)(B).

9. A motions hearing will be held pursuant to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 12(c) where:

a. The government makes timely disclosures and a defendant pleads particularized matters for which an evidentiary hearing is necessary; or
b. Oral argument is requested by either party in its motion, objection or response pleadings.

10. If required, the motions hearing shall take place before the undersigned on October 15, 2021, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom 9W, Diana E. Murphy U.S. Courthouse, 300 South Fourth Street, MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota. D. Minn. LR 12.1(d).

11. TRIAL:

a. IF NO PRETRIAL MOTIONS ARE FILED BY DEFENDANT: the following trial and trial-related dates are:

All voir dire questions and jury instructions must be submitted to Chief District Judge John R. Tunheim on or before November 22, 2021.

This case must commence trial on November 29, 2021, at 9:00 a.m. before Chief District Judge Tunheim in Courtroom 15, Diana E. Murphy U.S. Courthouse, 300 South Fourth Street, MINNEAPOLIS, Minnesota.

b. IF NO PRETRIAL MOTIONS ARE FILED, the trial date, and other related dates, will be rescheduled following the ruling on pretrial motions. Counsel must contact the Courtroom Deputy for District Judge Tunheim to confirm the new trial date.


Summaries of

United States v. Thomas

United States District Court, District of Minnesota
Jul 14, 2021
21-cr-93 (JRT/TNL) (D. Minn. Jul. 14, 2021)
Case details for

United States v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Robbin Allen Thomas, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, District of Minnesota

Date published: Jul 14, 2021

Citations

21-cr-93 (JRT/TNL) (D. Minn. Jul. 14, 2021)