From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 16, 2013
No. 1:12-cr-00341 LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2013)

Opinion

No. 1:12-cr-00341 LJO-SKO

04-16-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SAY TAYLOR, Defendant.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692 Acting Federal Defender CHARLES J. LEE, Bar #221057 Assistant Federal Defender Designated Counsel for Service Attorney for Defendant SAY TAYLOR CHARLES J. LEE Assistant Federal Defender Attorney for Defendant SAY TAYLOR


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, Bar #87692
Acting Federal Defender
CHARLES J. LEE, Bar #221057
Assistant Federal Defender
Designated Counsel for Service
Attorney for Defendant
SAY TAYLOR

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE

STATUS CONFERENCE HEARING


DATE: July 22, 2013

JUDGE: Hon. Lawrence J. O'Neill

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel that the status conference in the above-captioned matter now set for May 13, 2013, may be continued to July 22, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. before the Honorable Lawrence J. O'Neill.

The parties have reached a resolution on this case and Mr. Taylor wishes to enter a plea at his next court hearing. However, the case is currently set on a date Mr. Taylor has to take his disabled daughter to a medical appointment. In consulting with counsel for the government, as well at Mr. Chy Yang, the Laotian interpreter generally used by the court, the next date available for all parties is July 22, 2013. Mr. Taylor would additionally request to be placed on the 1:30 p.m. calendar as he drives up from the Los Angeles area on the dates he is required to attend court.

The requested continuance is with the intention of conserving time and resources for both parties and the court. The parties agree that the delay resulting from the continuance shall be excluded in the interests of justice, including but not limited to, the need for the period of time set forth herein for effective defense preparation, defense investigation, and plea negotiation purposes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv).

Respectfully submitted,

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

By: ______________________

KAREN A. ESCOBAR

Assistant United States Attorney

Attorney for Plaintiff

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

By: ______________________

CHARLES J. LEE

Assistant Federal Defender

Attorney for Defendant

SAY TAYLOR

ORDER

Time is excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 3161(h)(7)(A) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and (iv). IT IS SO ORDERED.

Lawrence J. O'Neill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Apr 16, 2013
No. 1:12-cr-00341 LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SAY TAYLOR, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Apr 16, 2013

Citations

No. 1:12-cr-00341 LJO-SKO (E.D. Cal. Apr. 16, 2013)