From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2013
Case No. 2:11-cr-00215-MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 2:11-cr-00215-MCE

02-13-2013

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GERALD DONALD TAYLOR, Defendant.

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER Acting Federal Defender MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr. Assistant Federal Defender BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney JILL M. THOMAS Assistant U.S. Attorney


JOSEPH SCHLESINGER, #87692
Acting Federal Defender
MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr., #177913
Assistant Federal Defender
801 I Street, 3rd Floor
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: (916) 498-5700
Attorneys for Defendant

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE

STATUS CONFERENCE TO MARCH 7,

2013, AT 9:00 A.M.


Judge: Hon. Morrison C. England

THE PARTIES STIPULATE, through counsel, Jill M. Thomas, Assistant United States Attorney, and Michael Petrik, Jr., attorney for Mr. Taylor, that the Court should vacate the status conference scheduled for February 7, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., and reset it for March 7, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.

Defense counsel requires time to review discovery, to consult with Mr. Taylor, and to conduct investigation.

The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through March 7, 2013, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice served by granting Mr. Taylor's request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and Mr. Taylor in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (Local Code T4).

Respectfully submitted,

JOSEPH SCHLESINGER

Acting Federal Defender

________

MICHAEL PETRIK, Jr.

Assistant Federal Defender

BENJAMIN B. WAGNER

United States Attorney

________

JILL M. THOMAS

Assistant U.S. Attorney

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED. The status conference is reset for March 7, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. The Court finds that a continuance is necessary for the reasons stated above, and further finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Time is therefore excluded from the date of this order through March 7, 2013, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (Local Code T4).

________

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Taylor

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 13, 2013
Case No. 2:11-cr-00215-MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2013)
Case details for

United States v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GERALD DONALD TAYLOR, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 13, 2013

Citations

Case No. 2:11-cr-00215-MCE (E.D. Cal. Feb. 13, 2013)