Opinion
Case No. 2:12-cr-218
10-24-2013
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM DAVID TAYLOR, SR., Defendants.
JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY
OPINION & ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant William David Taylor's Renewed Motion for Evidentiary Hearing. (Doc. 61). Defendant originally filed a motion, through counsel, for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and a new trial, on October 14, 2013. (Doc. 47). On October 23, Defendant filed a motion to proceed pro se (Doc. 58), and filed a pro se motion for an evidentiary hearing regarding his objections to his guilty verdict (Doc. 59). The Court denied Defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (see Doc. 57), and denied the Defendant's motion for an evidentiary hearing (see Doc. 60).
Defendant now renews his motion for an evidentiary hearing. The Court has already denied the motion for a hearing, and denied the underlying motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. Defendant offers no good cause for the Court to revisit any of these prior orders.
Defendant's Motion (Doc. 61) is hereby DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
________________
ALGENON L. MARBLEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE