Opinion
CR-22-00370-001-TUC-RM (BGM)
07-11-2023
United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Nathaniel Dijon Taylor, Defendant.
ORDER
Honorable Rosemary Marquez United States District Judge
On June 21, 2023, Magistrate Judge Bruce G. Macdonald issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (Doc. 101) recommending that this Court deny Defendant's Motion to Preclude Statements (Doc. 84), and another R&R (Doc. 102) recommending that this Court deny Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. 87). No objections to either R&R were filed.
A district judge must “make a de novo determination of those portions” of a magistrate judge's “report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(3) (“The district judge must consider de novo any objection to the magistrate judge's recommendation”). Failure to object to the findings and recommendations of the magistrate judge “waives a party's right to review.” Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2).
The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Macdonald's R&Rs, the parties' briefs, and the record. The Court finds no error in the conclusions of Magistrate Judge Macdonald's R&Rs, and Defendant has waived his right to review by failing to file objections.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Reports and Recommendations (Docs. 101, 102) are accepted and adopted in full.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Preclude Statements (Doc. 84) is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence (Doc. 87) is denied.