From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tam

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2015
14-239 GEB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2015)

Opinion

          SHARI RUSK, Attorney at Law, Sacramento, California, Michael Chastaine, Attorney for Defendant Marco Borja.

          Clemente Jimenez, Attorney for Adalberto Valenzuela-Ruiz.

          Thomas Johnson, Attorney for Nelson Gutierrez.

          Dina Santos, Attorney for Gerald Osborne.

          Ronald Peters, Attorney for Sherlynn Charles.


          STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE

          GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

         Defendants, by and through their undersigned counsel, and the government, by and through Assistant United States Attorney, Michael McCoy, hereby agree and stipulate that this matter, set on calendar February 27, 2015 be continued to April 17, 2015 to allow counsel to review discovery and undergo defense investigation. Therefore the parties request a status conference of April 17, 2015 and that date available with the court.

         The parties further stipulate that the Court should exclude the period from the date of this order through April 17, 2015, when it computes the time within which the trial of the above criminal prosecution must commence for purposes of the Speedy Trial Act. The parties stipulate that the ends of justice are served by granting the defendants' request for a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial, and that this is an appropriate exclusion of time for defense preparation within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7) (Local Code T4).

          ORDER

         It is so ordered and that the matter shall be placed on the Court's calendar at 9:00 a.m. on April 17, 2015.


Summaries of

United States v. Tam

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California
Feb 24, 2015
14-239 GEB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2015)
Case details for

United States v. Tam

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. KENNETH TAM, et. al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 24, 2015

Citations

14-239 GEB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 24, 2015)