Opinion
19 Cr. 117 (LJL)
09-24-2021
ORDER OF FORFEITURE/ MONEY JUDGMENT
HONORABLE LEWIS J. LIMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
WHEREAS, on or about February 21, 2019, RICARDO TABOADA, (the “Defendant”), and another, was charged a in a four-count Indictment, 19 Cr. 117 (LJL) (the “Indictment”), with conspiracy to commit bank fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Count One); bank fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1344 and 2 (Count Two); conspiracy to commit loan fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371(Count Three); and aggravated identity theft, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1028A(a)(1), 1028A(b), and 2 (Count Four);
WHEREAS, the Indictment included a forfeiture allegation as to Counts One through Three of the Indictment, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(2)(A), of any and all property constituting, or derived from, proceeds obtained directly or indirectly, as a result of the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One through Three of the Indictment, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to commission of Counts One through Three of the Indictment;
WHEREAS, on or about September 10, 2019, the Defendant pled guilty to Count One of the Indictment pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation as to Count One of the Indictment and agreed to the forfeit, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(2)(A), a sum of money in United States currency representing the proceeds traceable to Count One of the Indictment;
WHEREAS, the Government asserts that $1, 341, 035.61 in United States currency represents property constituting, or derived from proceeds traceable to the commission of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained;
WHEREAS, the Government seeks a money judgment in the amount of $1, 341, 035.61 in United States currency, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853, representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, for which the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with co-defendant Daniel Duran to the extent a forfeiture money judgment is entered against Daniel Duran in this matter; and
WHEREAS, the Court finds that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the Defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:
1. As a result of the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment, to which the Defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $1, 341, 035.61 in United States currency (the “Money Judgment”), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offense charged in Count One of the Indictment that the Defendant personally obtained, for which the Defendant is jointly and severally liable with co-defendant Daniel Duran to the extent a forfeiture money judgment is entered against Daniel Duran in this matter shall be entered against the Defendant.
2. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment is final as to the Defendant, RICARDO TABOADA, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the Defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.
3. All payments on the outstanding Money Judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Transnational Criminal Enterprises Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the Defendant's name and case number.
4. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment in the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.
5. Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 853(p), the United States is authorized to seek forfeiture of substitute assets of the defendant up to the uncollected amount of the Money Judgment.
6. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.
7. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.
SO ORDERED: