From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Suter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 7, 2017
CASE NO.: 3:17-CR-00046-N (N.D. Tex. Jul. 7, 2017)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 3:17-CR-00046-N

07-07-2017

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RUDOLF SUTER (1)


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

After reviewing all relevant matters of record, including the Notice Regarding Entry of a Plea of Guilty, the Consent of the defendant, and the Report and Recommendation Concerning Plea of Guilty of the United States Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been filed within fourteen days of service in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the undersigned District Judge is of the opinion that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge concerning the Plea of Guilty is correct, and it is hereby accepted by the Court. Accordingly, the Court accepts the plea of guilty, and RUDOLF SUTER (1) is hereby adjudged guilty of 18 U.S.C. § 1621(2) Perjury in Federal Proceeding Under Oath. Sentence will be imposed in accordance with the Court's scheduling order. [×] The defendant is ordered to remain in custody. [ ] The Court adopts the findings of the United States Magistrate Judge by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released and should therefore be released under § 3142(b) or (c). [ ] Upon motion, this matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). [ ] The defendant is ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2). The defendant shall self-surrender to the United States Marshal no later than ___. [ ] The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) because the Court finds

[ ] There is a substantial likelihood that a motion for acquittal or new trial will be granted, or
[ ] The Government has recommended that no sentence of imprisonment be imposed, and
[ ] This matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release for determination, by clear and convincing evidence, of whether the defendant is likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c).
[ ] The defendant is not ordered detained pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3143(a)(2) because the defendant has filed a motion alleging that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why he/she should not be detained under § 3143(a)(2). This matter shall be set for hearing before the United States Magistrate Judge who set the conditions of release for determination of whether it has been clearly shown that there are exceptional circumstances under § 3145(c) why the defendant should not be detained under § 3143(a)(2), and whether it has been shown by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is likely to flee or pose a danger to any other person or the community if released under § 3142(b) or (c). SIGNED this 7th day of July, 2017.

/s/_________

DAVID C. GODBEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Suter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Jul 7, 2017
CASE NO.: 3:17-CR-00046-N (N.D. Tex. Jul. 7, 2017)
Case details for

United States v. Suter

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RUDOLF SUTER (1)

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Jul 7, 2017

Citations

CASE NO.: 3:17-CR-00046-N (N.D. Tex. Jul. 7, 2017)

Citing Cases

Suter v. Denton

See generally Compl. (ECF No. 3); see also Denton v. Suter, No. 3:11-cv-02559-N, (N.D. Tex.); In re Rudolf…